Logo 
Search:

Unix / Linux / Ubuntu Forum

Ask Question   UnAnswered
Home » Forum » Unix / Linux / Ubuntu       RSS Feeds

TV vs Monitor

  Date: Feb 12    Category: Unix / Linux / Ubuntu    Views: 229
  

Been looking at larger 27" monitors lately. What with both TVs and "Monitors"
being either 720i or 1080p with HDMI input, is there really any difference
between the two beyond the fact that TVs have a tuner built in? For some reason,
TVs are generally priced much less than monitors of the same size. I know back
in the CRT days there was a Big quality difference but is that so today?

Share: 

 

6 Answers Found

 
Answer #1    Answered On: Feb 12    

A friend got a TV about that size a couple of months ago as his monitor.
While he is generally satisfied he says small text isn't very clear. His is
an "off brand" used mainly for games.

 
Answer #2    Answered On: Feb 12    

Back in the old days of TV all the video in the US had to conform to the
NTSC standards. That standard included a vertical sweep of 525 lines,
which were interlaced so a single frame of video took two complete
sweeps, for a vertical resolution of 262.5. This is the equivalent of
262.5 rows of "Pixels" in today's terminology. Since the aspect ratio
was 3:4, that means the equivalent Horizontal rate was 350. Thus the
resolution in the good old days was about 350X262.5--pretty sad by
today's standards.

That explains why your computer display looked so bad if you managed to
get it pumped into your TV at all.

Now days the typical resolution of HD TV is 1920 X 1080. There are
other standards even higher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vector_Video_Standards2.svg

The modern display does not treat incoming video from your monitor any
differently than it does video from the built in digital tuner. If you
TV looks good displaying digital TV, it will look good displaying
Digital Video from your computer Video card.

 
Answer #3    Answered On: Feb 12    

Hooked up a 10.1" netbook to a 32" TV using HDMI wasn't expecting it
but picture was stunning and played HD video perfectly. So I'd say
there's little difference these days and if your situation calls for
using the TV as a monitor you have no problems, at least with HDMI
which I'd recommend.

 
Answer #4    Answered On: Feb 12    

Anyone using, can recommend, a VGA to HDMI adapter for a netbook?

 
Answer #5    Answered On: Feb 12    


I wish I had a good suggestion for you.

One thing to watch out for is the inability of the TV to report its resolution
to the computer with most VGA to HDMI adapters. That means you'll have to force
Ubuntu to produce the proper resolution. I have no personal experience with it,
but I've read messages from people who were tearing their hair out.

If memory serves, this was also discussed on an episode of Tekzilla.

 
Answer #6    Answered On: Feb 12    

Is there some reason you can't use the vga directly? Almost all recent TV's
have a vga input. Mine is almost a year old and has one.

I bought a shielded 25 foot vga cable and it gets a perfect 1920 x 1080
picture on my LED TV from my desktop computer. Only disadvantage is that it
does require a separate audio line. HDMI does both.

 
Didn't find what you were looking for? Find more on TV vs Monitor Or get search suggestion and latest updates.




Tagged: